Corrigenda 

We re-read and cross-check (by all co-authors) all our papers many, many times before submission. Even so, sometimes mistakes survive until the final publication. Allow me here to state these mistakes as far as I am aware of them. 

These are rather small and do not warrant a request to the journal to amend any data of the publication. Nevertheless, let me at least share here the mistakes I am aware of so far. Let me know if you find any other issues or have any questions regarding our published work.

ATP-protein interaction study (https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c13118)

In our 2021 ATP paper, Figure S6 in the Supporting Information erroneously labels an adenine nucleotide with the text adenosine. In the study, Mayu and I had done experiments on adenosine, but none using adenine. We would have loved to check adenine as well, but looking at the structure and solubility data, this seemed infeasible. Thus, the text is correct, but the drawn structure in Figure S6 is wrong.

Couete flow MD study (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.06.006)

In our 2020 proteins in flow MD paper, the legend of Figure 2 claims that GROMACS resets a box angle during shearing when the angle gets larger than 45 degrees (making it -45 degrees). A reader asked me if this was really the case. For us, it did not matter much since we were continuously shearing the solution and were not interested in the precise angle. However the reader was interested in the specific angle. Looking again at the source code (in the function correct_box_elem) of GROMACS, it appears more that the angle is 30 degrees (or 60, depending from which side you look at it).

NMR structure of the HOIL-1L NZF domain (https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8IM5)

In the pdb file, there is a second Zn2+ ion there which is not real. Only 1 Zn2+ is in the zinc finger (coordinated by the 4 cysteine residues). I will reach out to the PDB to fix this.